Law enforcement requests for user data from Apple, Google, and Meta mean that these companies can decide whether government authorities have access to your personal information, including location data. This means the companies with the most insight into our lives, movements, and communications are frontline arbiters of our constitutional rights and the rights of non-US citizens—a fact some are likely feeling more acutely now than ever.
Collaboration between Big Tech and the Trump administration began before Donald Trump’s swearing-in on January 20. Amazon, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Uber each gave $1 million to Trump’s inauguration. Separately, in personal donations, so did Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Apple’s Tim Cook.
Americans concerned about the Trump administration and Silicon Valley’s embrace of it, may consider becoming a “digital expat”—moving your digital life off of US-based systems. Meanwhile, Europeans are starting to see US data services as “no longer safe” for businesses, governments, and societies.
Here’s a brief rundown of the privacy, security, and civil liberties issues related to the use of US-based digital services that suddenly feel more urgent—and what to do about it.
Cozying Up
In anticipation of Trump’s inauguration, Meta-owned Facebook, Instagram, and Threads made drastic policy changes citing alignment with Trump administration values, to permit hate speech and abuse “on topics like immigration and gender.” Meta also signaled its allegiance by ditching its fact-checkers—a frequent target of MAGA world ire. Two days after the inauguration, Meta quietly rolled out pro-life moderation actions through post suppression and account suspensions. Zuckerberg explained the company’s new direction to staff, saying: “We now have an opportunity to have a productive partnership with the United States government.”
Meta did not immediately respond to our request for comment regarding its partnership, data sharing, or policy changes.
Google followed suit. The company changed its Maps and Search results to rename part of the world—the Gulf of Mexico—following a Trump executive order renaming it the Gulf of America, despite the the US claiming control of less than 50 percent of the Gulf. Apple and Microsoft also followed Trump’s order.
Google’s consumer products also received a swath of updates in line with the new administration, including further changes to Maps, Calendar, and Search. Next, Google removed the new administration’s “banned” terms from its Google Health product. Then it did an about-face on its public promise not to build weaponized AI tools, such as Project Dragonfly, which was discovered in 2018 to be tailoring Google’s entire platform to enable China’s aggressive crackdown on its citizens. When reached for comment, Google did not immediately respond.
Big Tech aligning with the Trump administration matters because its business models rely on surveillance and amassing our personal data. Meta, Google, Apple and other large tech firms are among the gatekeepers standing between privacy and government requests for user data. Even when tech firms must comply by law, they’re often still free to decide how much information they collect about people and how long they store the data.
Government Hand-Outs
Current US laws around tech, privacy, and government requests have been guided by bulwarks like the Fourth and Fifth Amendments, US court rulings, and tech companies’ willingness to question the federal government’s opinion that it is entitled to access our personal information and location data. Apple, Google, and Meta each have language about law enforcement data requests that make it seem like they have our backs when it comes to overreach. Now, with companies shaping certain policies, tools, and practices in pursuit of “partnership” with the Trump administration, these companies’ powers over our data takes on new focus.
Generally, law enforcement can compel US companies to hand over user data using a subpoena, court order, search warrant—or, in rarer cases, a National Security Letter (NSL). As Google explains, an NSL is “one of the authorities granted under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).” Google adds, “FISA orders and authorizations can be used to compel electronic surveillance and the disclosure of stored data, including content from services like Gmail, Drive, and Photos.” How companies respond to these demands can vary in consequential ways.
A nearly decade-old battle over encrypted communication provides a clear example of the push and pull over user data between tech companies and federal law enforcement. In 2016, the FBI tried to compel Apple to backdoor an iPhone so law enforcement could access its encrypted contents. Apple refused to break its iOS security to do so. Then-candidate Trump said the company should be made to comply or be punished. “We should force them to do it,” he stated. Backdoors for law enforcement data access became a pet project in Trump’s first term; his DOJ appointee Rod Rosenstein launched a 2017 campaign to rebrand encrypted communications (and locked phones) as “law-free zones.” By 2019, Trump officials were brainstorming laws and bans against “unbreakable” consumer security measures, like end-to-end encryption.
The second Trump administration’s stance on encryption is less clear. Prior to Trump’s new term, in December 2024, FBI officials urged Americans to use encrypted messaging apps in the wake of cyberattacks on telecom companies attributed to the Salt Typhoon hacking campaign. (Since then, Trump’s team disbanded the DHS board investigating Salt Typhoon.) When reached for comment regarding the administration’s current stance on companies using forms of encryption law enforcement can’t break, a While House official told WIRED via email: “The White House looks forward to working with industry leaders to unlock the Golden Age of digital literacy.”
Apple did not immediately respond to WIRED”s request for comment.
Big Tech’s MAGA pivot is pointedly problematic for countries that rely on services like Meta platforms for government communications, official emergency response coordination, social tools like Marketplace, news, public health messaging, and small business services. Officials in one New Zealand district are exploring Facebook and Instagram exit strategies “until such time as we can be assured of the safety of our whole community and the integrity of democracy on these platforms.”
It’s a global concern. This week, an annual report on the global state of democracy, the Varieties of Democracy project (V-Dem), told reporters, “the United States will not score as a democracy when we release [next year’s] data.” V-Dem’s principal investigator, Staffan Lindberg, added: “If it continues like this, democracy [in the US] will not last another six months.” With an expected downgrade to the status of electoral autocracy, the US will share its label with Turkey, Hungary, Iraq, India, and Russia.
This makes Big Tech’s data collection, storage, control over, or any use of that data an even more urgent issue around the world. This is particularly true for countries the US government has in its sights for territorial expansion, extracting resources, or MAGA grievance politics.
Of course, saying, “just quit Facebook” is one thing—it’s not that simple. Ditching Messenger and WhatsApp for Signal is pretty straightforward, though. Trading X for Bluesky is easier. Keep in mind that both are currently based in the US and that these are merely safer alternatives. In other words, editing your digital footprint is an act of risk and harm reduction, where you identify threats and take the appropriate steps for your situation to reduce potential harms to yourself and those you care about.
Cutting Ties
If you’re thinking it might be handy to know about secure non-US options for your digital footprint, good news: There are a variety of well-established services worth checking out—ones that are increasing in popularity as fears of a DOGE-Facebook partnership seem less far-fetched by the day..
In the wake of deletions and alterations in the Trump administration’s war on science, accurate health information, inclusion, and equity, an archived copy of the CDC’s pre-Trump website is hosted in Europe due to concerns about US jurisdiction. Similarly, the Internet Archive has a full, live copy of itself preserved outside the US (Internet Archive Canada), also using decentralized Filecoin storage for the 2024/2025 EOT Web Archive “as an added layer of preservation.”
It’s no coincidence that a majority of jurisdictionally-aware US data preservation efforts are listing ProtonMail accounts as their contact info. Proton is a Swiss company offering services comparable to Gmail, Google Drive and Docs, as well as having an end-to-end encrypted platform, a password manager, backup storage, photos, and a VPN. Proton explains in a March 2023 blog post that Swiss law and encryption protects Proton’s users from abortion-related data requests, and details the difference between data requests they receive and those sent to Facebook and Google.
For people who prefer globally accurate maps free of Trump Sharpie defacements, and the Gulf of Mexico keeping its name, check out MagicEarth, TomTom AmiGO, HERE WeGo (all Netherlands-based) or OpenStreetMap (global contributors). Check out Vivaldi (Norway) for browsing, and Qwant (France) or Startpage (Netherlands) for a search engine. IONOS (Germany) is a Squarespace/Wix alternative, Pixelfed (Canada) can stand in for Instagram. StoryGraph (UK) for Goodreads. Affinity (UK/AU) or Canva (AU) can replace Adobe products, and Kobo (Canada/Japan) for an ebook reader.
Check out Plex or Jellyfin for music and video, Nextcloud for file storage and syncing, LibreOffice for an office suite, Affinity Suite to replace Adobe, SearXNG for search—all based outside the US. Codeberg (EU) is basically an open source, privacy-forward, community-run Github; one user has a handy Linux-Is-Best/Outside_Us_Jurisdiction listing for digital service providers. If you’re looking for a non-U.S. Starlink alternative, Eutelsat may have you covered.
To find other services that suit your needs, take a look through this sprawling, collectively curated Non-US Alternatives List of everything from email to antivirus programs, e-commerce and social media options, and more. European Alternatives also has a growing collection of categories listing services from web analytics and cloud platforms to password managers, web browsers, calendars, and even a few music streaming services.
Concerns prompting people to jettison US digital services isn’t new, but it’s only getting more popular as the lines between Trump’s White House and Big Tech grow less distinct by the day. There are over a quarter million members in the r/degoogle subreddit, where members share tips, tricks, and reviews on everything they’re using to replace Google products or ditch US products altogether.
“Cancelled all my US streamers and moved to a Crave/GEM combo,” one member explained. “Spent 2 weeks moving to Proton and deleted/cancelled everything US during that process. Bye PayPal, bye Amazon, goodbye American everything.”
